Free Consultations | Tap To Call Today: 1.888.625.6265.

Electronic Medical Record.Electronic health records (EHR) have become standard in today’s medical field. Creating faster, more accessible charting and communication, both doctors and patients are taking advantage of this system. However, these programs can introduce problems, including misdiagnosis of medical issues and an increase in medication errors. History shows that malpractice suits tend to rise with technological advances, as this has certainly been the case with EHRs.

Types of Error

Responsibility for medical blunders lies with both humans and computers. For example, program design requires a specific order of documentation. In one case, a patient’s allergy was documented by a nurse, but not electronically posted in the program until after the doctor had completed the exam notes. The doctor’s ill-informed prescription resulted in an allergic reaction, and a subsequent lawsuit. Other possible EHR mistakes have been reported in court as well. Below is a list of the most common issues.

  • Data entry mistakes, the most obvious human error, are responsible for the majority of lawsuits.
  • Automatic fill-in and default templates are not reviewed properly, resulting in misinformation.
  • Copy-and-paste errors occur when medical staff is not careful with chart reviewing.
  • Improper training can lead to misuse of the program.
  • Lack of system alerts can cause medical professionals to overlook important information.
  • System failures can wreak havoc on many levels.
  • Patients can misinterpret information.

In the Courtroom

In the past, hand-written records could be deemed illegible in a courtroom. However, this problem does not occur with electronic records. While any combination of human or technological error may have occurred, courts consider EHR as official documentation.

Also of concern is the extensive amount of data available in electronic medical records. With so much more information to sift through, it is easier to overlook important medical details.

Heavy debate also surrounds the authenticity and dependability of electronic health records. These programs are responsible for processing payment, as well as documenting health records and multiple other tasks. The debate questions the exchange of insurance coding and other information between two or more parties. Who has access to the program? Can they manipulate medical portions of the program to affect billing outcomes? These are important points to consider when involved in a possible malpractice lawsuit.

Standard of Care

The evolution of the electronic medical record could create a shift in the legal standard of care that is expected of physicians. “Clinical decision guidelines” are installed in each program by manufacturers. A physician may, in good faith, choose a different course of treatment for a patient. By overriding a program alert, he or she could be held liable for malpractice. This potential for confusion and misinterpretation of who defines “standard of care” has instigated a recent discussion and will undoubtedly be considered in future cases.

Malman Law Can Help

With approximately 2,000 statutes and regulations governing these electronic programs, there are still many loopholes that can result in doctor and patient error. If your health has been compromised due to an electronic health record error, understanding your legal options is essential. The changing technological tides in the medical world can be overwhelming. Pursuing a medical malpractice lawsuit may seem equally daunting, but the team at Malman Law is committed to making the process as smooth as possible. We have successfully obtained compensation for countless clients, and we want to help you. Contact us today for a free consultation.

Firm Awards & Recognitions

Steven Malman was selected to the list. The list is issued by the American Institute of Legal Counsel. A description of the selection methodology can be found at http://www.aiopia.org/selection/.

  • Steven Malman was selected to the list. The list is issued by the National Academy of Personal Injury Attorneys. A description of the selection methodology can be found at http://www.naopia.com/selection-process.

  • Steven Malman was selected to the list for 2018-2019.

  • Only the top 100 trial lawyers from each state or highly-populated regions of certain states who are actively practicing in civil plaintiff and/or criminal defense law are eligible for invitation. Invitees must demonstrate superior qualifications, leadership skills, and trial results as a legal professional. The selection process for this elite honor is based on a multi-phase process based upon objective and uniformly applied criteria which includes peer nominations combined with third party research.

    Prospective members of The NTL are carefully screened prior to receiving an invitation for membership.

Client Review

  • "I'm very pleased to recommend Malman Law to my friends and relatives! I have to mention how efficient and professional in dealing with my case has been with everyone that I've been in contact with at Malman Law. Mrs. Sabo is outstanding as well as her secretary and assistant in responding quickly to any of my questions or concerns. This firm has gone above and beyond to keep me updated and get answers to my questions at any time, weekends included! Malman Law rules in my opinion! "

    - Cheryl Wagemann
View More Testimonials

Know Your Rights!

Why People Choose Malman Law

You’ll want our experience on your side.
You’ll want your lawyers to be this good.

  • Credibility & Experience

    20,000+ Cases over 25 Years
  • Track Record of Success

    Over $200,000,000 Collected
  • Team of Litigation Lawyers

    Real Courtroom Experience