COVID-19 Notice: Malman Law’s staff is working at office & from home so that we can do our part to fight the spread of this virus within our community.Learn more
Res ipsa loquitur, more commonly referred to as “res ipsa,” is the Latin phrase for “the thing speaks for itself.”
In tort law, this is an important concept, because the doctrine addresses the fact that negligence may be inferred simply from the nature of the injury or accident. Therefore, no direct evidence of negligence is required, because the injury or accident speaks for itself. In this instance, the plaintiff could use circumstantial evidence, and the defendant must prove with a preponderance of proof that they are not at-fault.
The term translates from Latin, and its earliest known use was when Cicero used it in his speech Pro Milone. However, the legal doctrine’s first note in history was during the case of Byrne v Boadle, where one attorney took inspiration from Cicero’s words and used it for the writing of his case.
The case that allowed res ipsa to apply to personal injury was when a plaintiff suffered injuries from a falling barrel of flour at a warehouse. At the trial, the personal injury attorney for the plaintiff stated that the facts of the accident spoke for themselves; therefore, the plaintiff did not need to provide any further evidence of negligence. The reason for citing res ipsa was that there was no other explanation for how a person could suffer from a barrel of flour falling on them, so it was obvious that the defendant was negligent.
Since this case, the res ipsa doctrine has been allowed. Judges and juries can use common sense to determine if a situation is unique or to assume that the accident would not have occurred without negligence.
Res ipsa allows for the use of circumstantial evidence, which is very powerful. Therefore, the courts have made it clear that there must be factors present in the case that warrant the use of this doctrine. The four elements required are:
One area commonly misunderstood is that of the exclusive control element. It is difficult to prove that someone has exclusive control. Therefore, modern case law shows less rigidity in the formulation. The evidence must, however, eliminate other factors involved in the accident that can be placed on another party.
For example, say a man is injured when an elevator plunges from several floors up. The company that built the elevator is also responsible for maintaining it. So, the victim sues the manufacturer, because they are responsible for making and maintaining the broken elevator. In this instance, the court may grant res ipsa. The plaintiff would only have to prove that the fall occurred because it was evident through common sense that the elevator malfunctioned in some way – from here, it can be inferred that the company that created and maintained it was responsible. In this example, there is no further evidence needed to establish the case.
If your injuries are partially your fault, or the defense can establish that you contributed in some way to the accident, your case might be dismissed. Or, the burden of proof will be shifted back to you to prove that the defense was more at fault than you were.
In Illinois, the modified comparative negligence rule under 735 ILCS 5/2-1116 applies. This means that the recovery of damages is reduced based on the amount of negligence contributed by the plaintiff. The plaintiff cannot receive damages unless he or she is considered less than 50 percent at-fault. So, if the claimant is found 51 percent at-fault, he or she cannot recover.
The amount of contribution on behalf of the plaintiff will reduce the settlement value. So, even if you were at fault and collect compensation, your payment amount will be reduced based on your contribution to that event. If the court determines that you were 20 percent at-fault, then your settlement amount is reduced by 20 percent, too.
The defense often uses contributory fault as a defense to res ipsa. They may try to state that the plaintiff had ample time to avoid injury, or show that the plaintiff contributed enough to disqualify the case for the res ipsa doctrine. Therefore, it is imperative that anyone injured in a res ipsa case – or any negligence incident – have a Chicago personal injury attorney by their side.
Personal injury attorneys are prepared for the defense of other law firms and insurance companies. They know what tactics these companies will use to reduce settlement or lower the burden of proof on their end. With a personal injury lawyer, you can fight the claims against you that state that you were at fault, especially when you contributed in no way to your accident.
Prima facie and res ipsa are commonly confused for one another. Prima facie, which is Latin for “at first sight,” is a common-law doctrine that requires one party to show the minimum amount of evidence needed before the court will grant the case an official trial.
The difference between these two doctrines is that one means there must be enough evidence to answer the case, and the other implies that the facts are obvious enough that no explanation or evidence is needed. Therefore, one must always be established, while res ipsa only applies when the incident speaks for itself.
The defendant still must owe the victim a duty of attention. Therefore, if no duty was required of the respondent, which is rare, there would be no case and no basis for res ipsa. There are instances where a person does not owe a duty of care. For example, some states do not require landowners to provide a standard duty of care to trespassers. So, if an intruder suffered an injury that generally would apply for res ipsa, but the court decides the owner did not owe a duty of care, then the trespasser’s injuries were not the responsibility of the landowner.
The duty of care must be established to qualify for the res ipsa doctrine. Therefore, a plaintiff’s injury attorney must determine the duty owed with evidence or common sense. For example, a driver who decides to drive drunk owed a duty of care to the public to follow the rules of the road and operate a vehicle safely. Therefore, they had a duty and breached that duty.
There are instances where the defense can move to counter the use of res ipsa. However, they must provide evidence, because the burden of proof transfers to the defense if the court feels that the doctrine of res ipsa applies.
The defense would need to show that the plaintiff interfered with the events that led to the defendant’s negligence. So, they do not need to disprove negligence, but rather that the plaintiff played a role in the injury. Using a preponderance of evidence, the defense would be able to show that the plaintiff did not take reasonable steps to avoid injury, or that the injury could occur even if the defendant took reasonable care to avoid it.
For example, say the man struck by a barrel of flour was only harmed because an earthquake shifted the barrels over the side of the building. If the defense had taken measures to secure the barrels, but the force of the quake was too strong, then they could argue there was no way to prevent the injury.
They are very helpful, and when it comes to getting things done with your case I had the pleasure of working with Jason Kellerman he was awesome I highly recommend them.
- Britany Weaver
I’m very pleased to recommend Malman Law to my friends and relatives! I have to mention how efficient and professional in dealing with my case has been with everyone that I’ve been in contact with at Malman Law. Mrs. Sabo is outstanding as well as her secretary and assistant in responding quickly to any of my questions or concerns. This firm has gone above and beyond to keep me updated and get answers to my questions at any time, weekends included! Malman Law rules in my opinion!
- Cheryl Wagemann
I’ve been knowing about this Law firm for many years through friends, referrals & advertisements, never I thought I would need their services because I believed things & situations don’t happen to me like this, long story short I was in a situation that I needed help & advice!!! In the right direction, I connected with the Firm & a very patient, understanding professional woman by the name of Margie assisted me in what I needed 🙂 Thank you I will refer as I was as referred as well This firm really does care!
- Elvira G.
I was rear-ended by a semi-truck on my way to work. I was transported to the hospital and my car was totaled. In the aftermath, Dan Petrich and Anna Schmidt from Malman Law helped me get set up with physical therapy and negotiated with the insurance companies to make sure the resulting settlement would cover my medical bills and a rental car until I could get a new car. I would highly recommend their services.
would do everything they could for me.
- Tony S.
I contacted Malman Lawafter my work injury. So professional from my first phone call. Mr. Malman’s investigator, Dan, came right out to our home. Everything was explained in detail so I know what to expect during this process. I certainly recommend anyone ever in need of a personal injury lawyer to call Malman Law. Truly the best!! Thanks, everyone!
- Devin Jones
Attorney Greg Lamorena was my lawyer when I slipped and fell. He kept me updated throughout the case and was always available to talk when I had questions. He is a great lawyer and could not be happier about my settlement!
- Annie Ong
Alexis was the attorney on my case! She kept me in the loop about everything with my case. If I had any concerns I was able to contact her and she’ll answer my questions right away. If you’re interested in working with Malman Law I would highly recommend Alexis she was GREAT. I would highly recommend Malman Law if you’re ever in need!
- Eugenia Cathery
They are so efficient and professional. Always available to help. Attorney Boyer was great and very good with my case. I really appreciate Malman Law. I gave them 5 stars because there is nothing higher.
- Omolewa Snyder
I have had an amazing experience with Malman law so far. From the start, Dan was super easy to work with, got me the medical attention I needed, and fast. Couldn’t ask for better communication. Neil Kilcoyne has been nothing but the best I could not recommend a better attorney. Malman Law is a 10 out of 10 law firm.
- Trevor Harris
Hi, I just want to acknowledge Jay McCarron, Kelly & the firm at Malman Law for representing me as they continue to work on my case. Thanks for keeping me updated & responding quickly to any of my questions or concerns. I would highly recommend you and your firm to friends & family. E. P.
- Ernest Pitts
Alexis was the attorney on my case and she was GREAT. She made sure I was updated on everything about my case. I would highly recommend Malman Law if you’re ever in need.
- Ariel Fleming
I had the best experience with Jason and Jay attorneys from Malman Law they really went all the way to settle my case I’m telling you there just the best!! Recommend 100%!
- Carmen Rivera
Adam Meadow acted as the attorney for a family member who was in a car accident. He was highly personable and actively listened to our issues throughout the litigation process. He was able to get us a settlement for the reparations of the accident. We would recommend their services!
- Greg Gustafson
Excellent customer service and a great experience. Malman Law handled the whole process and it was very smooth. The settlement was a great success. I would choose Malman Law again in the future.
- Malak St.Clair
Helped me out of a big jam when my auto was hit twice when and the other drivers had no insurance. Adam Meadow is the only Lawyer I will call for helping me and my daughter.
- Devri Lott
I cannot give enough praise to the team at Malman Law, for helping with my case. My children were involved in an auto collision and the attorney Adam along with his paralegal Michelle worked diligently until the matter was resolved and my entire family was happy. I would definitely recommend Malman Law for anybody going through legal troubles.
- Adrian Lopez
A close friend recommended me to Malman Law. I currently have a case with them due to a car accident I had and ever since the accident they have been taking care of everything for me without me having to worry about anything. They took care of the medical bills & helped me get physical therapy right away. I highly recommend them.
- Vanessa Leon
Bella Feinstein, Jason Kellerman, and Terry Davey have been instrumental in helping me through many difficult situations. Not only did they work to get my mom a settlement, but they have also continued to help me through the legal process of relocating my mom to a different state. I’m very grateful for their hard work and good advice.
- Nyah Vuljanic
This law firm is the best they got me paid and Malman Law kept in constant communication with me which meant a lot to me I would highly recommend this law firm to anyone who. In the position, they are awesome sincerely. Jeff walker
- Jeff Walker
Mr. Kellerman of Malman Law shows compassion for his clients. Returns calls and emails promptly, he takes time to listen to his clients, and gather facts accordingly.
- Steve Acosta
Everyone at Malman Law made me feel welcomed and heard. My lawyer, Adam Meadow, as well as staff, kept me up to date and were more than happy to do so! I would highly recommend their services. Also- a plus is many employees are fluent in Spanish. My experience was easy and worthwhile.
- Adrianna Gomez
Dan Petrich was the best man for my case of falling through my porch of an apartment I rented. He made sure I got what I deserved not only $ wise but medical wise and that my hospital bills and Dr bills were left at a $0 balance before closing my case. I was definitely happy and glad I choose him. Thank you. 5 stars
- Jose Cruz
Steve Malman helped me with my auto case. He quickly responded and answered any and all the questions I had. My case was a success as well as 2 other family members I recommended to him won their cases as well. Definitely a 5 star!
- Meagan Cruz
- Eddie Villarreal
I am very impressed with Malman Law and my experience with Tiffany Alberty. She was very professional and knowledgeable. I appreciate the great communication and never felt out of the loop. She was very patient and hard working on my case. I would highly recommend this firm. Thanks for the hard work and all your help!
- Madissen Miller
Malman Law is definitely professionals and skilled at what they do. Mr. Adam Meadow always kept me informed and never hesitated to answer my questions and was open to hearing my concerns. Wouldn’t think twice about referring them to family and friends. Thank you to all at Malman Law!
- Christina Ocon
Mailman Law, Excellent firm!! Tiffany Alberty and her assistant Margie Gallegos were super efficient and knowledgeable. Great communication—very quick response and great follow up! My case was resolved sooner than expected. I highly recommend them!
- Adriana Martinez
So glad I contacted Malman Law regarding my accident. Professional and caring. Thank you Mr. Malman. I most definitely recommend to anyone if you need the best to call Malman Law!!!
- Virgil Sanner
I really appreciated and enjoyed Yennin Calderon’s service. I called asking questions and she was so helpful. Not only did she answer all my questions and concerns. It was also a bonus that she was bilingual in Spanish! Loved the warmth she brought. Thank you!
- Jazlyn Caraballo
My experience with Malman Law was great. I worked with Attorney Tiffany Alberty and her assistant Margie. Both communicated what was going on with my case, explained the next steps, and got my case resolved early. I would highly recommend Malman Law.
- Ashley Jenkins
ALL FIELDS REQUIRED
2 years ago I was involved in a trucking accident involving a 14-wheeler truck that nearly disabled me for life. Steve fought to make sure that I received the most possible compensation for my injuries. I was about to take the insurance company’s lowball offer, but decided to call Steve first – it was the best decision I’ve made yet
NOAH TAFFELPersonal Injury Victim